On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:32:05AM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 07:29, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 04:08, Hanna Czenczek <hre...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 06.02.23 17:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 07:36, Hanna Czenczek <hre...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Should we schedule a call with Jason, Michael, Juan, David, etc to > > > > discuss further? That way there's less chance of spending weeks > > > > working on something only to be asked to change the approach later. > > > > > > Sure, sounds good! I’ve taken a look into what state we’ll need to > > > migrate already, but I’ll take a more detailed look now so that it’s > > > clear what our requirements are. > > Hi Hanna, > The next step is getting agreement on how the vhost-user device state > interface will work. Do you want to draft the new vhost-user protocol > messages and put together slides for discussion with Michael, Jason, > Juan, and David in the next KVM call? That might be the best way to > get agreement. Doing it via email is possible too but I guess it will > take longer.
Let's get a proposal on list first please. If there's a disagreement we can do a call too, but give everyone time to review. > If you don't want to design the vhost-user protocol changes yourself > then someone on this email thread can help with that. > > Stefan
