On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 07:40, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > I read this on Friday, and decided to let it sit until after the > weekend. Well, it's now Tuesday, and to be frank, it's still as > offensively flippant as it was on Friday. It shows either ignorance of > or cavalier disregard for the sheer amount of work some of us have had > to put into keeping old versions of Python viable.
>From my point of view it is definitely ignorance. I simply didn't expect that a serious major scripting language would be making it this hard to write code that is backwards compatible with older but not ancient versions. thanks -- PMM
