On 20 January 2012 16:57, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsd...@calxeda.com> wrote: > On 01/20/2012 10:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> It's still not clear to me from this conversation if the right >> answer is "0", "-1" or "anything that's not a valid board ID >> and not -1 either"... > > Quoting Rob from upthread: > "0 or -1 is the right value as those are obviously meaningless." > > The original code that Rob wrote had a board_id of -1. That's > the right answer.
In that case you need a patch that causes arm_boot to actually pass -1, not 0xffff. (Also it would be nice if the kernel barfed if (id == -1 and there's no appended device tree), but that's not a qemu thing.) -- PMM
