* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:49:11AM +0000, Dov Murik wrote: > > This RFC patch series is based on AMD's RFC upmv10-snpv3 tree [1]. > > I've seen postings of the kernel patches for SNP using the kernel > UPM support, but I don't recall ever seeing these QEMU pieces > posted for review. The code in that QEMU branch looks different > from the last posting of SNP to qemu-devel years ago. > > IMHO it would be very desirable if that QEMU UPM tree was submitted > to qemu-devel for review feedback
Some of the patches in there look like they're not dependent on SNP or the UPM interface; (eg some CPU model updates). It's probably worth posting those separately so that they can be reviewed and merged and out of the way. > before requesting review of patches > that build on top of it. But at the same time it seems right for Dov to send these patches for review. Dave > > With regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
