On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:48:57AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:32:58AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:12:23PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > All attempts to fix up passing RNG seed via setup_data entry failed. > > > Let's just rip out all of it. We'll start over. > > > > > > > > > Warning: all I did was git revert the relevant patches and resolve the > > > (trivial) conflicts. Not even compiled - it's almost midnight here. > > > > > > Jason this is the kind of approach I'd like to see, not yet another > > > pointer math rich patch I need to spend time reviewing. Just get us back > > > to where we started. We can redo "x86: use typedef for SetupData struct" > > > later if we want, it's benign. > > > > This approach looks suitable for applying to the 7.2 tree too, > > which will be good for fixing the regressions in stable. > > Since no further alternative has been proposed, can you consider sending > a pull request for this series. This has been broken for too long and > many users & vendors are looking for an official fix to be applied to > master before they backport to 7.2 > > With regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Will do. Thanks!
