On 01/24/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >>> > >>> But viewing RAM as just another device, having Xen only restore a > >>> subset of > >>> devices should be a reasonable thing to do moving forward. > > I don't think modeling device memory (i.e. vga vram) as something > independent from the device (vga) is a good idea. Because it isn't.
Right. We should have VMSTATE_RAM() to express the dependency. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
