* Leonardo Bras (leob...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Since the introduction of multifd, it's possible to perform a multifd
> migration and finish it using postcopy.
>
> A bug introduced by yank (fixed on cfc3bcf373) was previously preventing
> a successful use of this migration scenario, and now it should be
> working on most cases.
>
> But since there is not enough testing/support nor any reported users for
> this scenario, we should disable this combination before it may cause any
> problems for users.
>
> Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leob...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/migration.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index ae2025d9d8..c601964b0e 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -1356,6 +1356,11 @@ static bool migrate_caps_check(bool *cap_list,
> error_setg(errp, "Postcopy is not compatible with
> ignore-shared");
> return false;
> }
> +
> + if (cap_list[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD]) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Postcopy is not yet compatible with multifd");
> + return false;
> + }
> }
>
> if (cap_list[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_BACKGROUND_SNAPSHOT]) {
> --
> 2.40.0
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
