Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> It does not even pair with a qatomic_mb_set(), so it is clearer to use
> load-acquire in this case; they are synonyms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
queued on my tree.
I guess this is for 8.1, right?
Later, Juan.
> ---
> migration/postcopy-ram.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> index 41c07136501a..23befd5ca8a2 100644
> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> @@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static PostcopyState incoming_postcopy_state;
>
> PostcopyState postcopy_state_get(void)
> {
> - return qatomic_mb_read(&incoming_postcopy_state);
> + return qatomic_load_acquire(&incoming_postcopy_state);
> }
>
> /* Set the state and return the old state */
