On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:01:54PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > @@ -2480,6 +2471,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
> >      }
> >  
> >      s->vmfd = ret;
> > +    s->check_extension_vm = kvm_check_extension(s, 
> > KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM);
> 
> Hm, it's a bit strange to set s->check_extension_vm by calling a
> function that already checks for the value of
> s->check_extension_vm... would it be better to call kvm_ioctl() directly
> on this line?

Yes that's probably best. I'll use kvm_vm_ioctl() since the doc suggests
to check KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM on the vm fd.

Thanks,
Jean

> 
> I think it would be good if some ppc folks could give this a look, but
> in general, it looks fine to me.
> 

Reply via email to