Am 26/04/2023 um 10:45 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> On 26/04/2023 10.16, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> Pause the job while draining so that pause_count will be
>> increased and bdrv_drain_all_end() won't reset it to 0, so the
>> job will not continue.
>>
>> With this fix, the test is not flaky anymore.
>>
>> Additionally remove useless aiocontext lock around bdrv_drain_all_end()
>> in test_complete_in_standby().
>>
>> Fixes: b6903cbe3a2 "tests/unit/test-blockjob: Disable
>> complete_in_standby test"
>> Suggested-by: Hanna Czenczek <hre...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eespo...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/unit/test-blockjob.c | 17 +++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-blockjob.c b/tests/unit/test-blockjob.c
>> index a130f6fefb..46d720aeee 100644
>> --- a/tests/unit/test-blockjob.c
>> +++ b/tests/unit/test-blockjob.c
>> @@ -488,11 +488,15 @@ static void test_complete_in_standby(void)
>>       bdrv_drain_all_begin();
>>       assert_job_status_is(job, JOB_STATUS_STANDBY);
>>   +    /*
>> +     * Increase pause_count so that the counter is
>> +     * unbalanced and job won't resume
>> +     */
>> +    job_pause(job);
>> +
>>       /* Lock the IO thread to prevent the job from being run */
> 
> I guess the above comment should now be removed, too?
> 
>> -    aio_context_acquire(ctx);
>>       /* This will schedule the job to resume it */
>>       bdrv_drain_all_end();
>> -    aio_context_release(ctx);
> 
>  Thomas
> 
Makes sense, resending

Emanuele


Reply via email to