Il gio 11 mag 2023, 17:53 John Snow <js...@redhat.com> ha scritto:

>
> You're right, in the "optional" case for sphinx the error isn't really
> *that* bad or serious. I'll try to work this or something very similar to
> it in.
>
> I was thinking it could be up to the caller to discard the input, but I
> suppose we can also route the semantics down into the tool, too.
>
> I'll play with it.
>

If you think that what I posted is okay or at least a start, I can squash
it in.

Paolo


> --js
>
>>

Reply via email to