On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:29:47AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 5/19/23 05:06, Yang Zhong wrote:
> > 
> > Paolo, please help add below queued sgx fix into this PULL request, which 
> > was
> > missed from last time, thanks a lot!
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-04/msg00841.html
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-04/msg00896.html
> 
> Isn't this commit 72497cff896fecf74306ed33626c30e43633cdd6?
> 
> Author: Yang Zhong <yang.zh...@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Apr 6 02:40:41 2023 -0400
> 
>     target/i386: Change wrong XFRM value in SGX CPUID leaf
>     The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
>     FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}.  As a result,
>     SGX enclaves only supported SSE and x87 feature (xfrm=0x3).
>     Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based 
> features")
>     Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zh...@linux.intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.y...@intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.hu...@intel.com>
>     Message-Id: <20230406064041.420039-1-yang.zh...@linux.intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>

  Oh, So sorry for this,,, it's my fault.
  
  I missed PULL email information for this patch,
  Apr 21 Paolo Bonzini   (1.4K) [PULL 16/25] target/i386: Change wrong XFRM 
value in SGX CPUID leaf

  Regards,
  Yang

> Paolo
> 
> 

Reply via email to