On 2012-02-09 09:35, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 03:51:43PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-02-04 13:32, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:23, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de> wrote:
>>>> On 2012-02-04 13:12, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:02, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Helpful to understand guest configurations of things like the i440FX's
>>>>>> PAM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> memory.c | 6 ++++--
>>>>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
>>>>>> index ee4c98a..ea4adda 100644
>>>>>> --- a/memory.c
>>>>>> +++ b/memory.c
>>>>>> @@ -1608,23 +1608,25 @@ static void mtree_print_mr(fprintf_function
>>>>>> mon_printf, void *f,
>>>>>> ml->printed = false;
>>>>>> QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(alias_print_queue, ml, queue);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> - mon_printf(f, TARGET_FMT_plx "-" TARGET_FMT_plx " (prio %d):
>>>>>> alias %s @%s "
>>>>>> + mon_printf(f, TARGET_FMT_plx "-" TARGET_FMT_plx " (prio %d,
>>>>>> %s): alias %s @%s "
>>>>>> TARGET_FMT_plx "-" TARGET_FMT_plx "\n",
>>>>>> base + mr->addr,
>>>>>> base + mr->addr
>>>>>> + (target_phys_addr_t)int128_get64(mr->size) - 1,
>>>>>> mr->priority,
>>>>>> + mr->readonly ? "RO" : "RW",
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the reserved regions which are unreadable and unwritable
>>>>> should be shown as well. Then the output should be a combination of
>>>>> 'R', 'W' or neither ('-').
>>>>
>>>> Reserved regions are in the hand of some other device model (so far only
>>>> the KVM kernel). That says nothing about their R/W property. If we ever
>>>> have a reserved region that is not writable, the owner could still set
>>>> the corresponding flag for documentation purposes.
>>>
>>> OK. But it's also possible for a region to have readable == false
>>> while readonly == false, which would imply 'WO' or '-W'. That also
>>> supports separate 'R', 'W' and '-' flags.
>>
>> Yep, I encoded the ROM device state as well. And this revealed a
>> regression of the memory region conversion of the cfi02. Gave up
>> counting how often I fixed this type of bug in the flash code.
>
> Is this patch ready to go? Seems fine to me but do you still want to
> add the 'WO' output that Blue Swirl suggested?There is v2 on the list, but I removed trival from CC due to the discussion. Needs an ack from Blue, I think. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
