On 6/6/23 14:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 16:50:05 -0700
<ank...@nvidia.com> wrote:

From: Ankit Agrawal <ank...@nvidia.com>

The GPU device memory is reported to the VM as a BAR. The device memory
may not be aligned to the power-of-2, but the QEMU expects the PCI BAR to
be. Align the reported device memory size to the next power-of-2 before
QEMU does an mmap.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ank...@nvidia.com>
---
  hw/vfio/common.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index 4d01ea3515..bb49200458 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -2061,7 +2061,7 @@ int vfio_region_setup(Object *obj, VFIODevice *vbasedev, 
VFIORegion *region,
region->vbasedev = vbasedev;
      region->flags = info->flags;
-    region->size = info->size;
+    region->size = info->size ? pow2ceil(info->size) : info->size;
      region->fd_offset = info->offset;
      region->nr = index;

Nak, this means our kernel emulation of the BAR is broken, a BAR that
is not naturally aligned is not a PCI BAR.

Right. So the common code could check this value is correct, like:

  assert(is_power_of_2(->size));

Or less violet using error_report :)

Reply via email to