On 5/22/23 21:47, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 18:14 +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:This test takes care to check the changes on different entitlements when the guest requests a polarization change. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> --- tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py index 30d3c0d0cb..64e1cc9209 100644 --- a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py @@ -244,3 +244,59 @@ def test_polarisation(self): '/bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching', '0')self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)+ + def test_entitlement(self): + """ + This test verifies that QEMU modifies the polarization + after a guest request. + + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio + """ + self.kernel_init() + self.vm.add_args('-smp', + '1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=3,cores=2,maxcpus=24') + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=1') + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=2') + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=3')Why the -device statements? Won't they result in the same as specifying -smp 4,...? Same for patch 17.
A left over. You are right it is the same. thanks, Pierre
