Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 13:19, Matheus Tavares Bernardino > <quic_mathb...@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > Ah, it's interesting that [1] doesn't include 'bc' and 'bs' in the list > > of cmds that may respond with a stop-reply packet: > > > > "The 'C', 'c', 'S', 's', 'vCont', 'vAttach', 'vRun', 'vStopped', and > > '?' packets can receive any of the below as a reply." > > > > But their definitions at [2] do say the following: > > > > 'bc' (and 'bc') > > [...] > > Reply: See Stop Reply Packets, for the reply specifications. > > > > So I guess the list from [1] is not exhaustive. Anyway, thanks for the > > fix! > > That looks like it's probably a gdb docs bug (forgetting to > update that list when the bc/bs packets were added); we > should probably report that to upstream gdb.
Good idea, done: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/2023-June/050804.html
