On 26/07/2023 10:07, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 09:44 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
On 25/07/2023 11:05, David Woodhouse wrote:
From: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk>
Fuzzing showed that a guest could bind an interdomain port to itself, by
guessing the next port to be allocated and putting that as the 'remote'
port number. By chance, that works because the newly-allocated port has
type EVTCHNSTAT_unbound. It shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk>
---
hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org>
Thanks. I'll change the title prefix to 'hw/xen' since it's in hw/ not
target/i386.
Yes, makes sense.
Please can I have also have a review for
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20076888f6bdf06a65aafc5cf954260965d45b97.ca...@infradead.org/
Sorry I missed that. Done.
Cheers,
Paul
