the patch
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-11/msg02162.html> link:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-11/msg02162.html

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 1:44 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 01:22:08AM +0800, Jason Chien wrote:
> > As far as I know, the order issue is caused by nested device
> realization. In
> > this case, realizing TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_HOST will also
> > realize TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT(see designware_pcie_host_realize()).
> > device_set_realized() is the function that realizing a device must go
> through,
> > and this function first realizes the device by dc->realize() and then
> realizes
> > the device's child bus by qbus_realize(). Whether there is any child bus
> of the
> > device may depend on dc->realize(). The realization flow will be like a
> > recursive call to device_set_realized(). More precisely, the flow in
> this case
> > is: qdev_realize() --> ... --> FIRST device_set_realized() --> FIRST dc->
> > realize() --> ... --> designware_pcie_host_realize() --> qdev_realize()
> --> ...
> > --> SECOND device_set_realized() --> SECOND dc->realize() --> ... -->
> >  designware_pcie_root_realize() --> ...--> back to the SECOND
> > device_set_realized() --> SECOND qbus_realize() the CHILD bus "dw-pcie"
> --> ...
> > --> back to the FIRST device_set_realized() --> FIRST qbus_realize() the
> PARENT
> > bus "pcie".
> >
> > I also found this patch that solves the same bus issue.
>
> Which patch?
>
> > Do you have any suggestions on the order of realization? Thanks!
>
>
> I see. It's not easy to fix. Worth thinking about but I guess your
> patch is ok for now.
>
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 5:24 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:22:50AM +0000, Jason Chien wrote:
> >     > In pcie_bus_realize(), a root bus is realized as a PCIe bus and a
> >     non-root
> >     > bus is realized as a PCIe bus if its parent bus is a PCIe bus.
> However,
> >     > the child bus "dw-pcie" is realized before the parent bus "pcie"
> which is
> >     > the root PCIe bus. Thus, the extended configuration space is not
> >     accessible
> >     > on "dw-pcie". The issue can be resolved by adding the
> >     > PCI_BUS_EXTENDED_CONFIG_SPACE flag to "pcie" before "dw-pcie" is
> >     realized.
> >     >
> >     > Signed-off-by: Jason Chien <jason.ch...@sifive.com>
> >
> >     I think we should fix the order of initialization rather than
> >     hack around it.
> >
> >     > ---
> >     >  hw/pci-host/designware.c | 1 +
> >     >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >     >
> >     > diff --git a/hw/pci-host/designware.c b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> >     > index 9e183caa48..388d252ee2 100644
> >     > --- a/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> >     > +++ b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> >     > @@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static void
> designware_pcie_host_realize(DeviceState
> >     *dev, Error **errp)
> >     >                                       &s->pci.io,
> >     >                                       0, 4,
> >     >                                       TYPE_PCIE_BUS);
> >     > +    pci->bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_EXTENDED_CONFIG_SPACE;
> >     >
> >     >      memory_region_init(&s->pci.address_space_root,
> >     >                         OBJECT(s),
> >     > --
> >     > 2.17.1
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to