Guests typically enable MSI-X with all of the vectors masked in the MSI-X
vector table. To match the guest state of device, QEMU enables MSI-X by
enabling vector 0 with userspace triggering and immediately release.
However the release function actually does not release it due to already
using userspace mode.

It is no need to enable triggering on host and rely on the mask bit to
avoid spurious interrupts. Use an invalid fd (i.e. fd = -1) is enough
to get MSI-X enabled.

After dynamic MSI-X allocation is supported, the interrupt restoring
also need use such way to enable MSI-X, therefore, create a function
for that.

Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <jing2....@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Apply Cédric's Reviewed-by.
- Apply Alex's Reviewed-by.

Changes since v1:
- Revise Qemu to QEMU. (Cédric)
- Use g_autofree to automatically release. (Cédric)
- Just return 'ret' and let the caller of vfio_enable_msix_no_vec()
  report the error. (Cédric)

Changes since RFC v1:
- A new patch. Use an invalid fd to get MSI-X enabled instead of using
  userspace triggering. (Alex)
---
 hw/vfio/pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index 27a65302ea69..bf676a49ae77 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -369,6 +369,33 @@ static void vfio_msi_interrupt(void *opaque)
     notify(&vdev->pdev, nr);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Get MSI-X enabled, but no vector enabled, by setting vector 0 with an 
invalid
+ * fd to kernel.
+ */
+static int vfio_enable_msix_no_vec(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
+{
+    g_autofree struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set = NULL;
+    int ret = 0, argsz;
+    int32_t *fd;
+
+    argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*fd);
+
+    irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
+    irq_set->argsz = argsz;
+    irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD |
+                     VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
+    irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX;
+    irq_set->start = 0;
+    irq_set->count = 1;
+    fd = (int32_t *)&irq_set->data;
+    *fd = -1;
+
+    ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set);
+
+    return ret;
+}
+
 static int vfio_enable_vectors(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, bool msix)
 {
     struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
@@ -618,6 +645,8 @@ static void vfio_commit_kvm_msi_virq_batch(VFIOPCIDevice 
*vdev)
 
 static void vfio_msix_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
 {
+    int ret;
+
     vfio_disable_interrupts(vdev);
 
     vdev->msi_vectors = g_new0(VFIOMSIVector, vdev->msix->entries);
@@ -640,8 +669,6 @@ static void vfio_msix_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
     vfio_commit_kvm_msi_virq_batch(vdev);
 
     if (vdev->nr_vectors) {
-        int ret;
-
         ret = vfio_enable_vectors(vdev, true);
         if (ret) {
             error_report("vfio: failed to enable vectors, %d", ret);
@@ -655,13 +682,14 @@ static void vfio_msix_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
          * MSI-X capability, but leaves the vector table masked.  We therefore
          * can't rely on a vector_use callback (from request_irq() in the 
guest)
          * to switch the physical device into MSI-X mode because that may come 
a
-         * long time after pci_enable_msix().  This code enables vector 0 with
-         * triggering to userspace, then immediately release the vector, 
leaving
-         * the physical device with no vectors enabled, but MSI-X enabled, just
-         * like the guest view.
+         * long time after pci_enable_msix().  This code sets vector 0 with an
+         * invalid fd to make the physical device MSI-X enabled, but with no
+         * vectors enabled, just like the guest view.
          */
-        vfio_msix_vector_do_use(&vdev->pdev, 0, NULL, NULL);
-        vfio_msix_vector_release(&vdev->pdev, 0);
+        ret = vfio_enable_msix_no_vec(vdev);
+        if (ret) {
+            error_report("vfio: failed to enable MSI-X, %d", ret);
+        }
     }
 
     trace_vfio_msix_enable(vdev->vbasedev.name);
-- 
2.27.0


Reply via email to