Hi Gavin,

> From: Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 1:07 AM
> To: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-
> a...@nongnu.org
> Cc: m...@kernel.org; jean-phili...@linaro.org; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>; lpieral...@kernel.org;
> peter.mayd...@linaro.org; richard.hender...@linaro.org;
> imamm...@redhat.com; andrew.jo...@linux.dev; da...@redhat.com;
> phi...@linaro.org; eric.au...@redhat.com; oliver.up...@linux.dev;
> pbonz...@redhat.com; m...@redhat.com; w...@kernel.org; raf...@kernel.org;
> alex.ben...@linaro.org; li...@armlinux.org.uk;
> dar...@os.amperecomputing.com; il...@os.amperecomputing.com;
> vis...@os.amperecomputing.com; karl.heub...@oracle.com;
> miguel.l...@oracle.com; salil.me...@opnsrc.net; zhukeqian
> <zhukeqi...@huawei.com>; wangxiongfeng (C) <wangxiongfe...@huawei.com>;
> wangyanan (Y) <wangyana...@huawei.com>; jiakern...@gmail.com;
> maob...@loongson.cn; lixiang...@loongson.cn; Linuxarm <linux...@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 9/9] gdbstub: Add helper function to unregister GDB
> register space
> 
> Hi Salil,
> 
> On 10/12/23 05:43, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > Add common function to help unregister the GDB Register Space. This shall
> be
> > done in context to the CPU unrealization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
> > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vis...@os.amperecomputing.com>
> > ---
> >   gdbstub/gdbstub.c      | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >   include/exec/gdbstub.h |  5 +++++
> >   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> 
> With the following nits addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com>
> 
> > diff --git a/gdbstub/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub/gdbstub.c
> > index 349d348c7b..97b89e2d00 100644
> > --- a/gdbstub/gdbstub.c
> > +++ b/gdbstub/gdbstub.c
> > @@ -491,6 +491,21 @@ void gdb_register_coprocessor(CPUState *cpu,
> >       }
> >   }
> >
> > +void gdb_unregister_coprocessor_all(CPUState *cpu)
> > +{
> > +    GDBRegisterState *s, *p;
> > +
> > +    p = cpu->gdb_regs;
> > +    while (p) {
> > +        s = p;
> > +        p = p->next;
> > +        /* s->xml is static const char so isn't freed */
> > +        g_free(s);
> > +    }
> > +    cpu->gdb_regs = NULL;
> 
>         cpu->base_reg = 0;
>         cpu->num_regs = 0;


Sure. thanks

Salil.

> 
> > +    cpu->gdb_num_g_regs = 0;
> > +}

Reply via email to