Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de> wrote: > The function is currently called from two sites, one always gives it a > NULL Error and the other always gives it a non-NULL Error. > > In the non-NULL case, all it does it trace the error and return. One > of the callers already have tracing, add a tracepoint to the other and > stop passing the error into the function. > > Cc: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> queued.
