Hi Marion,

Hmmm as far as I knew Oracle is not porting all of their stuff to 
Solaris x86 and are heavily dug into RH Linux. In fact as you may know 
they have their own Distro of "Oracle Unbreakable RH Linux". This is 
what Oracle basically wants everyone to run their products on and which 
is why I did not think they were going to support much of their tech 
stack on Solaris x86. Please correct me if I am wrong though!

So you are saying that the X4200 you have is x86 based and you are 
running Oracle on Solaris x86? Are you running just the Oracle RDBMS or 
the whole Application Stack (ie: 11i)?

As for why the separate instances/environments, like I said this is for 
our Dev and UAT instances.

We have roughy 150 Prod Servers so that means we could easily use 300  
separate Dev or UAT environments. By going "Virtual" we could easily 
scale down our hardware and host those 300 environments on 100 physical 
servers each one hosting 3 qemu or vmware environments.

"Virtual" is definitely the trend lately. We probably will not run Prod 
environments on virtual hosts yet Dev and UAT will work fine.

Thx!

Tom


Marion Hakanson wrote:

>briglia at stanford.edu said:
>  
>
>>On the other hand we are starting to look at virtualizing some of our  Dev
>>and UAT environments to save on HW costs. One of the other  Architects on my
>>Team owns the project and he has been focused on  running VMWare using RH
>>Linux for both the Host and Guest Operating Systems.
>>
>>Stanford is a Solaris/Linux/Oracle shop so the virtual environments will
>>need to be Oracle RH Linux that will support an Oracle install. 
>>    
>>
>
>Why not run Oracle on Solaris-x86 directly?  We recently consolidated
>three racks of old SPARC servers, hosting 6 small instances of Oracle,
>onto a single Sun X4200, with each Oracle instance in its own zone.
>The DBA's say performance is faster.
>
>Sorry QEMU isn't involved, but why run six separate OS instances, each
>kernel taking up its own slice of RAM and disk space, each requiring
>separate patching and maintenance, when you can do it with a single OS?
>Solaris OS is free (even the regular Solaris-10 release, not only Open
>Solaris) -- Red Hat EL is not free, even to EDU's.  Red Hat doesn't
>have ZFS yet, either.
>
>Regards,
>
>Marion
>
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/qemu-discuss/attachments/20071031/cec2a54a/attachment.html>

Reply via email to