Hi Paolo, Hm - interesting. I did not test it myself.
However, when you say "tiff" - did you optimize it with pyramids? What compression did you use? Andreas ----- Original message ----- > Hi all. > Surprisingly, reading a slite raster is way faster than a plain TIFF. > Try this: in QGIS, questa > http://download.gfoss.it/TrueMarble/TrueMarble-250m.sqlite and this: > http://ueod-globe.net/globe/TrueMarble_GeoTIFF/TrueMarble.250m.21600x21600.D2.tif.gz > Caution: you'll need gfdal 1.7, and probably a 64 bit system, as the > sqlite file is > 2 Gb. > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
