Il 21/10/2010 23:46, Alex Mandel ha scritto: > Maybe we need to re-ask, re-answer the questions: > Who is the site for? > What information should it contain? > How much control do plugin authors need over their plugin?
Let me also go back to basic: - we *need* a bug reporting system for plugins: this is very urgent IMHO - we need a collaboration platform: it would be so much better if we could fix each other's bugs, and collaborate merging now separated, possibly complementary, plugins. Sorry Pirmin, I do not understand when you write "give away the control of ... source code"; I understand however the need for a benevolent dictator for each plugin, but this should not mean impossibility to contribute code to it, IMHO - our users would like a documentation, popularity, and feedback system - we need simple systems, easy to administer, not to use too much resources in keeping the system going. Anything else? All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer