Hi Carson, On Sun, 31. Oct 2010 at 15:15:23 +0000, Carson Farmer wrote: > I would actually much prefer it if people didn't use the check geometry > tool at all :-p It was never really meant to be a long-term tool (I really > just created it at the time to be a quick and dirty way to find issues > with shapefiles), and I know that Martin and his team have created a much > better geometry checker (in C++) that is kicking around somewhere that > would be much better suited to most users needs. In actual fact, there is > no attempt to follow OGC standards in the ftools geometry validity tool! > @ Martin: What is the status of your geometry checking tool? Is there > anyway that this might be incorporated into trunk somehow? I think it > would be much better to have something a bit more compliant, stable, and > with a few more of the features that have been mentioned in this thread > (some of which I think Martin's tool already has).
Hm, then we have three. I made QgsGeometry::validateGeometry(), when I needed to fix a bunch of polygons and found that the node tool refused to edit broken geometry at all. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-20 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de -- norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
