[email protected] scritti il 19/01/2011 11.30.15 > You are definitely right! > I agree that we probably should do the same as we did with 1.0 (with > less success) and call 2.0 a "Long Term release".
1.0 was almost abbandoned in favour of more stable 1.2/1.4. So I think it will happen when 2.2/2.4 will be out. If a 2.0 project can be opened with QGIS 2.2, I don't see why I should stay at 2.0 without all bugfixes of 2.2. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
