On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Ramon Andinach <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'd prefer "colormap", for the reason that you give.
>
> With "categorized" and "graduated" I think that they are clear enough, but 
> not what I would expect. If you were making a graph I was taught "discrete" 
> and "continuous" to describe these data types, and that is what I'd expect.
> The problem is categorized. Categorized data is data that's been grouped into 
> subsets (bins). So even the "graduated" data becomes categorized.
> (Take a set of numbers between 1 and 50 {1,2,11,13,22,24,33,35,44,46}, which 
> I treat as "graduated" data. I could then categorize them into 5 groups of 
> equal ranges {1,2}{11,13}{22,24}{33,35}{44,46} )

The "discrete" and "continuous" data types make some sense.
Still, I have an issue with this division: in mathematics "continuous"
and "discrete" terms have a different meaning: real numbers are
considered continuous, whole numbers are considered discrete. But both
real and whole numbers can be classified into ranges, even though only
real numbers are really continuous :-)


Martin
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to