LS,

We are using Quantum GIS for our wardens. I have a question of which I don't 
know where I can put it so I'm hoping one of you can get me into the right 
direction.

On our clients we have Windows XP sp2 as Operating System and on our 
fileservers we have Microsoft Server 2003 as Operating System.
We store our data files (shape files and raster files (ecw)) on the central 
file server.
For a shape file with a .shp file (size 3 MB) and a .dbf file (size 155 MB) it 
takes 7 minutes and 30 seconds to get the shape displayed on screen. Between 
the two locations there is a WAN of 10 Mbps.

Other applications (MapWindow, ArcGIS, DIVA-GIS) only take 40 seconds to do the 
same.
My presumption is that Quantum GIS first downloads the entire shape file onto 
the client before rendering. The other applications seem only to download the 
.shp file and to approach the .dbf file on the file server.

I have observed that it is the .dbf file that is taking the time because when I 
deleted a number of fields in the specific .dbf file time dropped to about 3 
minutes (and the size of the .dbf file dropped to 85 MB).
The other applications still gave the same result of 40 seconds. 

Can someone of you please tell me how Quantum GIS handles shape files on a 
remote file server and if / when Quantum GIS will be able to get the same 
results in performance as the other applications mentioned above?

I'm looking forward to receiving your answer.


Kind regards
Met vriendelijke groet,

Hans Windmüller
medewerker GIS
Rijksweg 501
1991 AS  VELSERBROEK
0251-661035
06-53792012
[email protected]
www.pwn.nl

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] Namens 
[email protected]
Verzonden: maandag 14 maart 2011 13:46
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Qgis-developer Digest, Vol 61, Issue 55

Send Qgis-developer mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Qgis-developer digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Last two days before feature freeze and 1.7   release
      timeline update (Luiz Motta)
   2. RE: crash addind wms server from mapproxy (Duarte Carreira)
   3. RE: crash addind wms server from mapproxy (Duarte Carreira)
   4. Re: Last two days before feature freeze and 1.7   release
      timeline update (Giovanni Manghi)
   5. QgsPostgresProvider and UseEstimatedMetadata (Ziegler Stefan)
   6. Re: Bringing diagrams into labeling-ng (Marco Hugentobler)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:38:21 -0300
From: Luiz Motta <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Last two days before feature freeze and
        1.7     release timeline update
To: Tim Sutton <[email protected]>
Cc: qgis-developer <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Tim,

I made update in Spatialquery  Plugin(see ticket #2634).

Regards,
Luiz


2011/3/14 Tim Sutton <[email protected]>:
> Hi all
>
> Just reminder that there is just today and tomorrow to get your last
> features in before we go into feature freeze. If there are patches
> still outstanding please bring them to a developer's attention and try
> to get them in before Wednesday.
>
> I'm also proposing to delay the release process by one week to allow a
> little more time for testing and bugfixing the new raster code. So the
> revised timetable would run:
>
> March 15 - Feature Freeze
> March 21 - String freeze (although it would be great if translators
> could get started already)
> April 7 - release branching
> 12 April - Release announcements (or when packages are available)
>
> Regards
>
>
> --
> Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
> ==============================================
> Please do not email me off-list with technical
> support questions. Using the lists will gain
> more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
> surrounding your issue will be shared with all.
>
> Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
>  * QGIS programming and support services
>  * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
>  * FOSS Consulting Services
> Skype: timlinux
> Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
> ==============================================
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:56:53 +0000
From: Duarte Carreira <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Qgis-developer] crash addind wms server from mapproxy
To: Luiz Motta <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I updated to r15470 and still crashes for me.

I don't set any CRS. Setting to 4326 still crashes.

I wanted to get some confirmation before opening a ticket.

I now have contradictory results. Some work fine, 1.6 crashes, I'm the only one 
that has a crash in latest trunk.

So I'll open a ticket.

Duarte

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Luiz Motta [mailto:[email protected]]
Enviada: segunda-feira, 14 de Março de 2011 11:30
Para: Duarte Carreira
Cc: [email protected]
Assunto: Re: [Qgis-developer] crash addind wms server from mapproxy

Duarte,

I can see OMS layer.

Enviroment:
Windows XP
QGIS trunck R15470

The problem is the on the fly.
It is need use the  same CRS of the OSM (EPSG: 4326) to work with others layers.

Luiz

2011/3/14 Duarte Carreira <[email protected]>:
> Can anyone confirm this?
>
>
>
> 1)      Add wms server http://osm.omniscale.net/proxy/service?tiled=true
>
> 2)      Connect, and answer twice "No" to questions about ignoring
> advertised url (I supposed this always happens with wms-c services?)
>
> 3)      Select "osm" layer
>
> 4)      Click Add
>
> 5)      QGIS crashes
>
>
>
> Using Win 7 32bit, QGIS 1.7 r15458.
>
>
>
> Duarte
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:00:42 +0000
From: Duarte Carreira <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Qgis-developer] crash addind wms server from mapproxy
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Ticket created:
https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3608

Duarte

De: Duarte Carreira [mailto:[email protected]]
Enviada: segunda-feira, 14 de Março de 2011 09:49
Para: [email protected]
Assunto: [Qgis-developer] crash addind wms server from mapproxy

Can anyone confirm this?


1)      Add wms server http://osm.omniscale.net/proxy/service?tiled=true

2)      Connect, and answer twice "No" to questions about ignoring advertised 
url (I supposed this always happens with wms-c services?)

3)      Select "osm" layer

4)      Click Add

5)      QGIS crashes

Using Win 7 32bit, QGIS 1.7 r15458.

Duarte
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20110314/3b08c6ce/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:10:26 +0000
From: Giovanni Manghi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Last two days before feature freeze and
        1.7     release timeline update
To: Tim Sutton <[email protected]>
Cc: qgis-developer <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <1300104626.2007.17.camel@sibirica>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"


> I'm also proposing to delay the release process by one week to allow a
> little more time for testing and bugfixing the new raster code.

Agree,

there are problems with the georeferencer

https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3596

with the "zoom to best scale"

https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3609


and with GRASS rasters

https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3582

https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3603



plus this that is really a stopper

https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3602

cheers

-- Giovanni --



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:29:16 +0100
From: Ziegler Stefan <[email protected]>
Subject: [Qgis-developer] QgsPostgresProvider and UseEstimatedMetadata
To: qgis-developer <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <H00002ea08fdcfe4.1300105754.srsofaioi6145.ktso.ch@MHS>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi

I have some problems with the zoom to full extent functionality with
posgresql layers. It seems that it is always selecting the estimated
extend and never the real extent from postgresql even with an unchecked
"Use estimated table metadata" checkbox.

regards
Stefan


Mit freundlichem Gruss
Stefan Ziegler
Leiter amtliche Vermessung

Kanton Solothurn
Bau- und Justizdepartement
Amt für Geoinformation
Rötistrasse 4
4501 Solothurn
Telefon 032 627 75 96
Telefax 032 627 75 98
[email protected]
http://www.so.ch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20110314/a30e7063/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:45:04 +0100
From: Marco Hugentobler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Bringing diagrams into labeling-ng
To: Martin Dobias <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Martin

Great. I'm going to commit probably tomorrow evening.

> - does this imply a complete removal of diagram overlay plugin?

At the moment, the diagram overlay plugin has more options (bar diagrams and 
the proportional svg symbols). Therefore I'm planning to remove overlay code 
and plugin after 1.7 because of backward compatibility.

> - does it make sense to you to remove the "overlays" tab in the
> options dialog? It only allows changing the PAL algorithm, I guess
> barely anyone knows what those options mean (and they don't make any
> difference anyway unless you have a very dense set of label
> candidates)

+1 (going to do this for 1.7)

> - I wonder if it wouldn't better to move QgsDiagramLayerSettings
> instance from QgsVectorLayer to QgsDiagramRendererV2. If I understand
> the code correctly, the diagram layer settings make sense only if
> there exists a diagram renderer, right?

Conceptually, it is the other way round (renderer is a part of the layer 
settings). But agreed, there is no need to keep both variables in the vector 
layer. Keeping only the settings variable should work too.

Regards,
Marco



Am Montag, 14. März 2011, um 10.08:34 schrieb Martin Dobias:
> Hi Marco
> 
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Marco Hugentobler
> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > There's a patch now that adds diagram support using QgsPalLabeling
> > (http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3583). It tries to change the labeling
> > classes as little as possible to not introduce additional issues.
> > 
> > Currently available are pie diagrams and text diagrams. My plan is to
> > also support bars (and maybe proportional svg symbols) and to remove the
> > vector overlay classes after 1.7.
> > 
> > What do you think, is it still ok for those changes to go into 1.7?
> > Looking forward to your comments.
> 
> I have looked at the patch and it seems fine to me. Some comments:
> - does this imply a complete removal of diagram overlay plugin?
> - does it make sense to you to remove the "overlays" tab in the
> options dialog? It only allows changing the PAL algorithm, I guess
> barely anyone knows what those options mean (and they don't make any
> difference anyway unless you have a very dense set of label
> candidates)
> - I wonder if it wouldn't better to move QgsDiagramLayerSettings
> instance from QgsVectorLayer to QgsDiagramRendererV2. If I understand
> the code correctly, the diagram layer settings make sense only if
> there exists a diagram renderer, right?
> - please do not forget to add notes to the new classes and new methods
> that they have been added in 1.7, if possible update also the bindings
> (I could help you if necessary)
> 
> Otherwise +1 from me to apply before the feature freeze.
> 
> Regards
> Martin


-- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland
[email protected] http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


End of Qgis-developer Digest, Vol 61, Issue 55
**********************************************
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to