On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Camilo Polymeris <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, SAGA provides no tag information. It would have to be generated > programatically from library/module name & description or provided in > a list. > Any thoughts on the GUI for that tree? More like SAGA's module tree or > more like GIMP's filter menu?
I would strongly prefer to have the module tree shown in something like QTreeWidget - I guess that is what you mean by SAGA's module tree. What we have right now is similar to GIMP's filter menu and for many users it gets too long and inefficient to use. > I don't think the > search/filter/favorites/frequently used part is very hard.. but still, > I will keep things simple. I don't think adding these features would be hard. A very important thing in projects like this one is to stay focused on the primary target and to keep the scope limited to a reasonable set of features. More bells and whistles can be typically added later. > Related topics: > * Interactive modules. I had this more or less resolved for SAGA (I > think), but designing a more generic solution could prove difficult. I will try to address these in a follow up to Julien's mail. > * Pushing pipelining to the implementation: Potentially more > efficient, but less generic. As you suggested in other post, the model of executing one module after other is completely sufficient (at least for next few years ;-) > * Undo & redo ability. Not really necessary, skip it. Regards Martin _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
