Hi On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Charlie Sharpsteen <[email protected]> wrote:
8<------snip---------------- >> >> Finally I have one major concern I have forgotten to discuss during >> the hackfest. There will be no commit revision numbers anymore, so >> developers will barely stay motivated to develop QGIS knowing that we >> will never reach (and celebrate) revision 16000 or 20000 (btw. now we >> are at r15861). Do you have any solution for that? Git's sha1 hashes >> for the commits may bring in some fun too, though they seem quite >> random :-) > > `git describe` will return the number of commits since the last tag or some > other reference point of your choosing if you need a linear "commit number" > to track. Another thing that can help developer motivation is `git shortlog > -s -n` which computes the number of commits per author and displays a sorted > list. > -Charlie > Ah good tip - thanks Charlie Regards Tim >> >> Cheers >> Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) ============================================== Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming and support services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net ============================================== _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
