Is this fork going to stay in sync with gvsig's trunk or is it going
its own seperate path ? I thought that after last year's talks about
differences between your OA edition and the official (but not public)
tree the situation would have improved.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:21:25 +0100 (BST), Benjamin Ducke wrote:
Hi Paolo (all) --
----- Original Message -----
[SNIP]
I didn't like their development model: AFAICT, there is a commercial
association of all gvsig devs; this has a strong potential for a
monopoly.
That's precisely why a number of users and external developers,
including myself, have now forked off the gvSIG Community Edition
(CE).
We are still in the process of building up the web infrastructure,
but the mailing lists are already active and you can read up on
progress in the list archives (the most active one is currently
the "community" list):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gvsigce/
http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=343517
Cheers,
Ben
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer
mailing
list [email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
------
Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open
Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit
http://iso26300.info for more information.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
