Robert Feel free to add your ideas on the wiki page. It's an early start and will see which direction(s) things will evolve to.
Cheers Saber On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 19:02 +0200, Robert Szczepanek wrote: > W dniu 27.06.2011 18:24, G. Allegri pisze: > > Maybe OMS could be a better route? > > > > giovanni > > You are right. I was talking already about it with Andrea from > HydroloGIS. This alternative must be considered. > > > 2011/6/27 Saber Razmjooei <[email protected] > > Hopefully OpenMI will take off soon. > > Why? > > > As you know, the software packages are very diverse for water modelling. > > What will be great to see, in short term, to offer QGIS as a platform > > for model building, post processing, etc. The intention, at least at > > this stage, is not to write yet another modelling package. > > In short term - agree. > > > There are several organizations/companies stuck with ESRI/Mapinfo/etc > > products to deal with their GIS input/output files. I guess to start > > with, will be good to persuade these types of users to migrate their > > GIS platform to QGIS by offering some simple set of tools to deal with > > their modelling packages. > > My goal is not related to import/export routines, which for sure are > also important. I don't treat QGIS just as GIS environment, but as > potential modelling environment. > Very seldom products you are talking are comprehensive. What I propose, > is to implement common interface on top of those products. This way > implementation will be much easier, or not ;). > > Robert _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
