The actual logo is very difficult to read at small size (32x32 and
16x16) because of the font used and all the details (gradient, shadow,
arrow). The SVG source file is a mess (non-blending parts, incoherent
shadow) and not scalable. And I would add that integrating the logo into
a modern-looking publication makes people die somewhere, I'm pretty sure
that's a fact.
Le 26/11/2011 21:32, Mars Sjoden a écrit :
I am just wondering what is wrong with the current QGIS icon/symbol?
Are there some complaints about it's design?
It currently seems simple, scalable, representative,
and recognizable amongst those who currently are using QGIS.
signed,
Devil's Advocate
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
