On 12/15/2011 08:20 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 15/12/2011 16:28, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: >>> Is there a recommendation to share the sources (such as >>> http://hub.qgis.org/projects/plugin-builder)? >> To share plugin sources you can use any SCM service such as GitHub, >> BitBucket, >> Google Code etc, or even setup own repo. AFAIK there are no strict >> recomendations >> on this. > IMHO it would be prefab to have a default location (git instance) for > all plugins, otherwise we'll end up quickly with a mess, especially > considering the number of plugins and plugin developers is quickly > increasing, and many of them will be possibly broken during the move to > 2.0 APIs. > All the best. >
There are 2 general choices that might make it easier - either put them on hub which provides git repos on demand or github where we have an org account. Though I need to check if the org put's it name on a github repo if it counts against the org quota. With the use of git there is not reason to have 1 single repo for all plugins, that kinda defeats the purpose of using git where it's cheap and easy to setup small repos per plugin. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
