I see Giovanni mention the change from absolut vs relative paths in qgs files: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/4665#note-1
We (jef and specially me) are responsible for this during Zurich hackfest... My argument was 'why would you have absolute paths, that is not portable'... But in the issue I see that this COULD be handy when using maybe the qgs-files voor qgis-server? Or at least: apparently users where counting on this? So: to recap: should we discuss this (and maybe roll back?). Or are relative paths just better.... Or will this end up in a war between absolute vs relative-adepts. Regards, Richard _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
