Most of the history looks good now that both the git and svn repos are listed, although I would think you really only need the git one since it contains the whole history.
I really like this view https://www.ohloh.net/p/3663/contributors/15732465252554 and https://www.ohloh.net/p/3663/map - Nathan On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Martin Dobias <wonder...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Tyler Mitchell <i...@locatepress.com> > wrote: > > > > You should be able to have both repositories listed on ohloh, I think I > did it > > with other sites before. Only git was enlisted. I assume someone > removed > > the SVN enlistment for a reason, but I just added it back in. Feel free > to remove > > it if I shouldn't have added it, but I think it should give you back the > history without > > too much grief with overlaps. Will take a while to show up. > > Our git repository contains the whole project history including the > period of usage of SVN. So it may be just necessary to regenerate the > statistics completely? > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
