You've done a great work Camilo, and obviously it's always a good thing having multiple approaches to the things, because it can be a richness. I only wonder if those working on such frameworks could converge to a common effort, somehow.
Probably you and Victor will desire to follow your own routes. In that case I hope the best results to both: we will have the opportunity to chose the best fitting solution ;) giovanni 2012/3/26 Camilo Polymeris <[email protected]> > Hello all, > as you may know (or not), I participated in last year's GSoC with > Quantum GIS, creating a "Processing Framework", that allows the user > access to data analysis tools from the GIS UI: > > http://polymeris.github.com/qgis/ > > The focus last year was on the general framework & SAGA support. This > was very well received, and we saw the addition of Orfeo as a backend. > There are also plans to add support to further libraries & to create a > "module workflow builder", a graphical interface to the interaction > capabilities provided by the framework. > > The experience was very rewarding, so I'd like to apply again this > year, with a project to improve on last year's work, adding > multithreaded support, UI improvements & SAGA support for the > remaining modules. > > The full proposal can be seen at the GSoC page: > > > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/polymeris/11002 > > Any comments are very welcome. > > Regards, > Camilo > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
