Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous. If it had been in master for a couple of months then I would say cool, but if it's in its own branch there wouldn't have been very wide user testing.
What is the performance like with large files? If I remembered correctly it struggled with my large ecws. - Nathan On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Tim Sutton <li...@linfiniti.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc > <jr.morre...@enoreth.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo > has > > not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of > > keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more > > backup. > > > > Marco - are you ready to merge? > > Regards > > Tim > > > regards, > > jean-roc > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > -- > Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) > ============================================== > Please do not email me off-list with technical > support questions. Using the lists will gain > more exposure for your issues and the knowledge > surrounding your issue will be shared with all. > > Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: > * QGIS programming and support services > * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans > * FOSS Consulting Services > Skype: timlinux > Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net > ============================================== > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer