On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Agustin Lobo <[email protected]> wrote: > I think there are 2 different issues here: > 1. The functionality of a given plugin should be in QGIS core > 2. An specific plugin, covering a core functionality, fulfills the > requirements to be in QGIS core > > We should agree on a list for 1 and a set of criteria for 2 > The criteria for 2 could be, at least: > -stability > - speed > - conform to a limited list of external dependencies > > Setting general criteria (that can be reviewed as this must be > flexible) will prevent many problems. >
I would add as priority criteria a decent unit test coverage and updated documentation p -- Paolo Corti Geospatial software developer web: http://www.paolocorti.net twitter: @capooti skype: capooti _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
