>> Just 1 question: I started working with a git clone right away, >> thinking the svn repo would be abandoned, but Victor tells me he is >> still commiting to svn. Could this be a problem in a future merge? >> > > Not I should be able to pull these changes through until svn is frozen. >
The reason why I want to do this is because I have no experience with GIT and I have now some ideas and more time that what I will have after the end of the month, so I prefer to concentrate on developing and not in learning how to properly use GIT, since I guess it is a bit different and misusing it can cause trouble later. If Camilo works on his own copy, how I can see his changes and work with them if I use just the SVN repo ? I guess I have a more SVN-like approach to version control after all these years (and some experience with messy commiters that made use waste time...), so I see it a bit more complicated. If it is not a problem, I would prefer to keep on working on the SVN and then freeze the SVN on the 20th as I mentioned, apply a big patch to the GIT repo and from that moment work only on GIT. Of course, comments are welcome, since maybe there is an easy way of doing this in GIT (maybe Camilo can keep on working in his GIT repo and commit changes to the SVN as well...) Regards _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer