Even Rouault wrote > > Selon Radim Blazek <radim.blazek@>: > > Regis, > > what are the dimensions (in pixels) of your big ECW ? >
My ecw is 1 080 000 * 1 090 000 pixels (IGN orthophotos for 28 French departement.. 1/4 of France surface) but I have also problem with scan25 and scan 100 that are smaller. (from 92 Go to 8 Go). This is really faster than a vrt with ten's of tiles.. except for single pixel queries. Radim, I'll try to to check if tiles are present, but I don't think so. We compressed it with ERmapper without tile option. I'm afraid I'm not yet able to test patches since I never compiled QGIS and don't really have machines, skills and time to do that. I really have to set up a dev machine. I could eventually send you a big ecw ? (10 Go on ftp) Do I understand that it might be possible to solve directly the problem, without having to add workaround options on project propertis as I suggested? Thanks guys, RĂ©gis Thoughts? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Large-raster-ecw-identify-very-long-tp4996953p4997042.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer