On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Alex Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/10/2012 12:51 AM, Tim Sutton wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> I'm noticing frequent downs in our infrastructure (now it's hub.qgis.org, >>> the other >>> day was qgis.org, etc.). I feel we're having more traffic, and our current >>> structure >>> is overstretched. Where can we find server stats to check this? >>> In any case, I think we should make our infrastructure stronger: opinion, >>> suggestions? >>> All the best. >> >> This is what I would like to do: >> >> - migrate QGIS.org web site to rst so that we can a) host it on >> gh-pages b) make it translatable more easily c) ease the load on the >> server >> - host downloads on gh >> - use QGIS.org only for hosting django and doing builds >> >> An alterior motive is that we will have a single platform for *all >> documentation* in QGIS and that we can use git as a content management >> and versioning system for our web site. >> >> Regards >> >> Tim >> >> > > http://webextra.osgeo.osuosl.org/munin/osgeo.org/qgis.osgeo.org.html > > It seems to be a memory leak of some sort.
WCS test using Mapserver running on wcs.qgis.org was added during the summer. I cannot imagine however how it could cause memory leak as it is running as simple CGI. I can decrease the number of WCS tests for now. Radim > Some speculate that it might > be ruby that runs hub.qgis. I actually think finding a new home for the > nightly builds would free up plenty of resources for the web needs, our > web server is not miniscule (2 cores, 4 GB of ram). You can also notice > from the charts that the issue came up several times over a couple of > days and then has not shown up for 5 days at all. > > I agree with the moving to rst but would prefer to continue to host it > using Sphinx to build the docs (obviously the files can live in git to > get the benefits that Tim mentions). To me this is more flexible and we > can install caching software. This is the same route Mapserver went a > couple of years ago, and the same setup we use for osgeo-live. > > As for downloads, we've always had downloads.osgeo.org available and can > use that at any time. For osgeo-live we actually pushed our downloads to > sourceforge recently to get 20 mirrors world-wide. If we really need > more capacity I can offer university based servers (no $ for bandwidth, > in addition to OSUOSL which is our current host and also at a univ). > > Basically I like github but cautious about using it for everything. > Enough files and it will start costing $ to keep it up. > > Thanks, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
