Hi On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:13 AM, John C. Tull <[email protected]> wrote:
8<----------snip--------------- >>> Beside some smaller issues the current state of master seems useable >>> and stable to me .. >> >> [1] http://semver.org/ > > Presumably, Qt5 would lead to some new broken api's relative to what has been > done in trunk towards the 2.0 release, but confirm if that is a valid > assumption or not. If it is, maybe a qgis 2.2 or higher release is a more > sensible target for the switch. If not, then it is more a matter of how long > transitioning and testing would take. > With such a big underlying change I would be inclined to make a make version release (be it 2.0, 3.0 or what ever). My understanding is that Qt5 is far more backwards compatible that Qt4 was and the impacts to end users / developers should be minimal (other than new Qt5 dependency). Regards Tim 8<----------snip--------------- -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) ============================================== Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming and support services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net ============================================== _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
