Hi Werner, but which license we should put in files? As I can see there is one open ticket [0] and one closed [1] and both about GPL v3(+?). But in other hand, most QGIS source files still contain reference to GPL v2+
[0] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/3789 [1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/3432 2012/10/3 Werner Macho <[email protected]>: > Dear developers, > > A long outstanding issue is (which is probably preventing QGIS from > being integrated into the "main" debian repository and the fedora > repository) that there are a lot of files inside our source tree that > have no or an unknown license with no copyright and so on .. > > I took the freedom to make a short list and sort out all file which > have no license header .. > > All in all I found 516 files without any license! > And bad news for Victor and sextante - 275 of them are in the sextante > subdirectories ;) > > I encourage and kindly ask all developers who committed this files to > add a proper header to those files to get a bit closer of being > adopted into the main repositories of the big Linux distributions (not > to forget that having a copyright and license in the files is anyway a > good thing to have) > > Find attached the list of the files (or if it does not go through the > server you can find the file in [1]) > > If you need any help drop me a note > thanks for your help > > kind regards > Werner -- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
