Hi On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Ramon Andiñach <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27/10/2012, at 07:41 , Tim Sutton wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> >> Firstly my apologies for taking so long to join in to this thread (and >> for top posting) - I haven't been able to come up for air since >> leaving Essen. In terms of the release roadmap for 2.0 the following >> items were discussed in the hackfest in Essen as being the key >> features we would hold the release for: >> >> 1) Raster overhaul >> 2) WMTS Support >> 3) Atlas integration for composer >> 4) WCS Client support >> 5) Transactional WFS support for QGIS Server >> 6) SIP Bindings revision >> 7) Symbology overhaul (needs support for random colour assignment and >> property change on multiselections) >> 8) Sextante >> 9) Threading (non blocker wait fro 3.0) >> 10) Labelling overhaul >> 11) Diagrams overhaul (and remove of old implementation) >> 12) Oracle support (non blocker for 2.0) >> 13) Web site and docs update >> 14) Universal usage of expression builder >> >> We agreed that when these features are present we will roll out the >> release, with the hope that that could take place early next year. >> Come end of December I think we should take a look at the items listed >> and if any are obviously not making headway we should remove them from >> the blocker list or find out if there is a way to bring them to the >> foreground. The list above was also not intended to be exclusive, so >> if other developments are offered for incorporation they will be >> considered and accepted / declined on their merits. >> > > I'd like to put an oar in from a user-end of things. If I may. > > I'd love to see threading in 2.0. It seems to be something that crops up > fairly frequently (e.g. "why does QGIS use only half the available CPU?" and > similar). Admittedly this isn't asked as frequently as the "why isn't there a > random in the New Symbology?" question but it is a question that is repeated. > It certainly seems to be something that people are wanting, and if a window > of opportunity exists at the moment, then perhaps it should be taken. > > Secondly, when Martin's bits do get merged in would it be possible for all of > us users to be reminded that 1.9/master is not stable and things will break? > Mailing list and a few blogs? > I say this because I'm fairly sure there's a lot of us that use 1.9 as if it > were stable (or at least as stable as the development versions that turned > into 1.7 and 1.8 were) and more than normally this is about not to be the > case.
How about we update the splash screen with a suitable 'this is going to break some eggs' warning....? Regards Tim > > The list above is really interesting and it's going to be a lot of fun > working out these new bits and pieces. > > -ramon. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) ============================================== Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming and support services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net ============================================== _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
