Hi! Just for the logs .. I agree with Jürgen in that case.. It does not make any sense to release a beta now - with some new implemented things and some not .. >From my point of view - the only last thing we are all waiting for is Martins threading implementation .. After merging his branch I'd vote for a feature freeze and a longer stabilization phase .. And then .. Lets' do the 2.0 ;)
regards Werner On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Jürgen E. <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > On Sat, 29. Dec 2012 at 18:38:26 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > Why not releasing a beta before merging? > > What for? > > Either we want that stuff in the release, then we need to merge it before > the > release and releasing a beta now of stuff that we're probably going to > break > IMHO doesn't make any sense. > > Then again I don't see a big point in releasing betas at all. We have > nightly > builds. And given that we have a feature freeze before a release those > will > also settle. If that isn't enough we could also schedule switch from > nightly > to weekly builds before a release to have an easier target for testing. > > Doing extra betas (and we like won't get away with just one) would just > imply > more work and extra infrastructure. > > > Jürgen > > -- > Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 > Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 > Software Engineer D-26506 Norden > http://www.norbit.de > committ(ed|ing) to Quantum GIS IRC: jef on FreeNode > > -- > norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH > Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden > GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
