Hi Olivier,

Thank you for your reply. For me its fine. I had to change other stuff in my layouts anyway (new email address, etc.). I am almost through all the changes.

My projects have to stay on the current version all the time. They should live for several years and improve gradually - along with improvements in QGIS. It is not an option to have older QGIS versions around for older projects. But that's our problem.

So basic shapes (rects, ellipses, triangles) should have a black stroke by default - a stroke-width of 0.2 mm, in my opinion. All other elements probably without a frame and background by default. Does this make sense?

Thanks,
Andreas

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:51:16 +0100, Olivier Dalang wrote:
Hi !

Those change appear because some properties have been added and some
removed to make the UI and the code more consistent (removing
duplicate border color settings for Shape item, for instance).
Upon opening an old project, the added properties will be set to
default, while the duplicate one will take the old unused property.

I'd say there's no easy way to avoid such side-effects (without coding
some dirty compatibility code). One way to handle such changes would
be to implement a kind of "old version file converter" to allow
backwards compatibility without making the code too complex.

But I'm not sure that if it's worth it. A general rule in software
usage is to keep the same version of the software throughout a
project, an to use new versions only when starting new projects.


However, it is possible to discuss if which composer items should have a background and/or frame by default. (in your case, this could change
whether composer items should have a background by default)

For now, I think all the composer items have a white background and no
frame by default, excepted the ComposerShape which has also a frame.


Olivier



2013/2/20 Andreas Neumann <[email protected]>:
Hi,

With the recent modifications in print composer, while I agree that the UI has much improved, there are unfortunately also some side-effects. Here are
two problems I have detected:

* legend boxes which had a white background now have a transparent
background
* Basic shapes (like rects, ellipses, triangles) that had a black border now
have either no border or a white border

For organizations like us, with a lot of QGIS projects with a lot of
different layouts, this is quite annoying if we have to manually change each
of the projects.

But I am also aware that we are using master / unstable and that there are modifications. I can live with such changes but I assume that other users
will have similar problems if backwards compatibility breaks.

Just to let you know - thanks for the improvements in the UI!

Andreas

--
--
Andreas Neumann
Böschacherstrasse 10A
8624 Grüt (Gossau ZH)
Switzerland
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

--
--
Andreas Neumann
Böschacherstrasse 10A
8624 Grüt (Gossau ZH)
Switzerland
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to