> > On testing saturation today, I did notice a potential bug with that setting. > For my test raster, I set the saturation to 1 and the difference between that > setting and 0 was quite large. If I move to 2, 3, 4, and so on, the > differences are very small and incremental. > > I'm wondering why the leap in saturation from 0 to 1? Is something incorrect > in the algorithm calculating saturation? It seems as the values between 0 and > 1 need to be handled to make the 0 to 1 change as incrementally small as the > 1 to 2. >
Can you create a bug report about this and attach your raster to it (if possible)? I'll take a look at this and see what's happening... Thanks! Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
