On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't mind the idea but I'm not for plugins living in the settings > dialog. Plugins are not settings they are their own standalone thing. > +1 > > Having some kind of settingsWidget() method exposed on each plugin that so > that we can add plugin settings in the settings dialog is not a bad idea, > but I think the installer and manager should live outside of the settings > dialog. > +1 > > - Nathan > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Denis Rouzaud <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Well, I like the idea of having everything grouped. >> >> For example in pyCharm everything is in one dialog: application and >> project settings. And you can search for anything in a search bar. >> >> If the left panels can be nested (as suggested previously), I would even >> consider integrating the project settings in the main settings. >> >> I would leave them directly accessible from menus of course, but just as >> shortcuts leading to the main dialog but with the right panel open. >> >> You then would have everything accessible at one place. >> >> >> On 04/30/2013 07:46 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Denis Rouzaud >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Do you think it could be interesting to integrate this also in the >>> settings dialog? If the left panel can be integrated as a tree widget item >>> in the panel of the settings dialog (as I just proposed for the labelling). >> >> >> Not sure I follow that. Why would you want plugins in the settings >> dialog? >> >> - Nathan >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
