New logos withdrawn. My 2 cents:
I feel like design #50 is overly generic. Simply logos are good, but wondering whether this one went on the road of simplification to the extreme, leaving a logo with a *slight* gap in meaningfulness. There could be ways to remedy to that while keeping overall design intact. Maybe by having some sort of faux-3d on the green triangle using gradients to make it more like an arrow. #338 has much more identify, both hinting at GIS and cooperativeness of open source project. The color palette could be improved (maybe dark gray or black for text, and a tango color scheme based colors for hands?), as well as making GIS a bit smaller, moving up, and allow space for 'desktop, android, etc.'. Math On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote: > New logos have been submitted from Larry. > > Feedback? > > - Nathan > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:33 AM, skampus < > stefano.cam...@regione.piemonte.it> wrote: > >> if i can say my opinion, my preference go to #338 >> >> s. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Logo-Update-tp5050419p5050555.html >> Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
